Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 5      1   2   3   4   Next   »
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #1 
A UCS Conservative - If you want to highlight the flaws of the first lady, we want to hear from you here.  If you want to point out supposed failures of POTUS, please come here and write about it.  If you want to talk about bad behavior of black people, we enjoy doing that here.  If you want to criticize TV news anchors who make mistakes, we need you here to talk about it.  And if you want to criticize left leaning people for their beliefs, please join us here as we do that every day.  But if you're a lefty and you've come here to criticize white Conservatives for name calling and/or personal attacks on other individuals, we don't want your kind here.  In fact, we'll call that whining along with a few other adjectives.  We believe any criticism of our behavior is simply crying while anything we moan about is fair and legitimate criticism that's too important not to call out.  Got it?

One thing is for certain.  This group of UCS Conservatives, for the most part, sure enjoys dishing it out but can't take any personal criticism of their own.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #2 
I can take it.  You call me weak minded, I didn't cry like a little biitch like you do.  I can find it somewhere, all the personal insults that joisey threw my way and I rolled with the flow.  I'll dig it up.

What else you got to dish out?  Let's see if I can take it

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
TylerDurden

Registered:
Posts: 3,869
Reply with quote  #3 
I can certainly take it - I just like pointing out the hypocrisy of those who do most of the complaining.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #4 
Ok, found them.  I'll compare anything that may have been said to you with these zingers from the hypocrite and the one from you today.  You have said others similar but I would just rather fight fire with fire than cry like a little biiitch like you and I'm not going to do more research for you.


"epitome of blindness"
"caricature of yourself"
"How childish can one get?" 
"
You strike me as a thinker who would listen only to himself"
" I appreciate the tone of your reply as it validates my post"
"How babyish can you get?????"  
"Damn, you can be disappointing" 
"What a waste of good intellect"
many more Texan jokes, one in particular about the Texan holding someone's testicles.  
"weak minded individual"

All real funny until someone gets a belly full of your dummassery.

Now you can see that you and joisey are nothing more than hypocritical bullies who wrote all those things.  These are things YOU and JOISEY wrote and then want to feign innocence.  Quit your bellyaching you little girl.  Such a waste of energy

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #5 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikec


Dewey - I am commenting on what I see as big issues that affect us all.  I don't remember saying anything about giving anyone a pass for using some of the language that you object to.  I think that what I said was that I am not anyone's dad here, and the commenters and commentees can decide how much they want to bat that ball back and forth.




mikec - I think the fact you call out what Democrats say and ignore what Conservatives say speaks for itself.  Whether you agree or not, those who look the other way in our everyday lives do effect all of us.  It is a big picture.  That said, I've seen you go to great lengths to call out other Democrat members inside here.  I've seen you question the comments and actions of black people, gay people, entertainers, and Liberals.  I've even seen you condemn people for internet comments against a family owning a pizza parlor.  No sticks and stones there.  This time you were willing to speak up.  In our current argument you're concerned with how Fox women are treated but the mocking of a school teacher here doesn't rise to the occasion for you.  Needless to say, you saying I'm nobody's "Dad" is a pretty shallow excuse for sitting on the sidelines depending on the political make-up of the offender.

As for infrastructure funding, I'll continue to disagree with you that Democrats had their opportunity and now it's there fault the GOP refuses to invest.  Somehow, you'll have to learn to accept that others think you are wrong in what you believe to know.  When we discussed immigration reform I told you if the Speaker would allow the House to vote on the Senate bill, immigration reform would already have been passed.  You told me I couldn't know that.  Do you see how people disagree?

Finally, I don't take personal offense for who you choose to call a liar.  I simply challenge you when and where I can.  In addition, I challenge the cheap comments that seem to have no constructive purpose.  You can pick out any comments the first lady makes and criticize them all you want.  However, when you call here a "piece of work", there's no explanation I can find other than that "warm fuzzy feeling" it must provide you inside which I describe elsewhere.  If you were willing to play somebody's Dad, you'd understand that a nonconstructive jab at another human being sets a very bad example.  Maybe if Michelle owned a pizza parlor it would be different.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #6 
" I simply challenge you when and where I can. "

therein lies your problem.  you 1]challenge, 2]retreat, 3]cower and 4]whine in that order.  You just admitted you 'challenge', hardly seems like one way criticism to me.  You are always criticizing

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #7 
kiir - The "one way" refers to hypocrisy.  The Right inside here will be critical all day long but if somebody on the Left is critical, some of those on the Right, (mostly you), will stalk and/or insult in hopes they'll drive these Lefties away.  Unfortunately, it's also been determined by some on the right, (mostly you), that if you call another member girly, moron, or idiot, and they respond by calling their opponent rude and disrespectful, it's somehow a wash as simply two people calling each other names.  Maybe that's your view but it's not the case where I come from.
ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 9,889
Reply with quote  #8 
Ad nauseum.

Lol
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #9 
FIB - All any of you had to do was stay on topic, make the case to the best of your ability, and avoid characterizing your opponent in a personal manner.  Unfortunately, the group in general must have determined that was a losing venture and most of you chose to get personal.  A dozen Conservatives believe they couldn't sell their case as long as "mostly one" voice stood in their way.  That's pathetic, imo.
ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 9,889
Reply with quote  #10 
Hahahah. Yeah, keep standing in our way. You're doing an awesome job!
mikec

Registered:
Posts: 8,299
Reply with quote  #11 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey

mikec - I think the fact you call out what Democrats say and ignore what Conservatives say speaks for itself.  Whether you agree or not, those who look the other way in our everyday lives do effect all of us.  It is a big picture.  That said, I've seen you go to great lengths to call out other Democrat members inside here.  I've seen you question the comments and actions of black people, gay people, entertainers, and Liberals.  I've even seen you condemn people for internet comments against a family owning a pizza parlor.  No sticks and stones there.  This time you were willing to speak up.  In our current argument you're concerned with how Fox women are treated but the mocking of a school teacher here doesn't rise to the occasion for you.  Needless to say, you saying I'm nobody's "Dad" is a pretty shallow excuse for sitting on the sidelines depending on the political make-up of the offender.

As for infrastructure funding, I'll continue to disagree with you that Democrats had their opportunity and now it's there fault the GOP refuses to invest.  Somehow, you'll have to learn to accept that others think you are wrong in what you believe to know.  When we discussed immigration reform I told you if the Speaker would allow the House to vote on the Senate bill, immigration reform would already have been passed.  You told me I couldn't know that.  Do you see how people disagree?

Finally, I don't take personal offense for who you choose to call a liar.  I simply challenge you when and where I can.  In addition, I challenge the cheap comments that seem to have no constructive purpose.  You can pick out any comments the first lady makes and criticize them all you want.  However, when you call here a "piece of work", there's no explanation I can find other than that "warm fuzzy feeling" it must provide you inside which I describe elsewhere.  If you were willing to play somebody's Dad, you'd understand that a nonconstructive jab at another human being sets a very bad example.  Maybe if Michelle owned a pizza parlor it would be different.


I find this whole response condescending and offensive.

On the red part, you are wrong.  I have written pages and pages on it, and you have only said "you are wrong."

As for the rest, this is the type of post that JG would criticize, were it directed at you.

As for the teacher - really?  Teacher, who is the queen of one-sentence posts, all of which are "you Republicans suck, are jerkwads, and should STFU." 

Whoever I may have condemned for the pizza thing were people calling for the business to be shut down, or the owners to be killed.  Isn't that condemnation worthy?

You criticize, daily, the GOP and Conservatives.  However, you have admitted that Dems can do no wrong, and that you will never criticize them.

Interesting.




Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #12 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikec


I find this whole response condescending and offensive.




mikec - Of course, that's become the standard response inside here.  I'm beginning to think we're supposed to call each other girly and feminine instead of calling out our inconsistencies and double standards.

In any event, please be more specific.  Pointing out how you are willing to condemn one side and not the other is condescending?  Asking you to justify the constructive purpose of calling the first lady a "piece of work" is being offensive?  You're condemning black people, Liberals, entertainers, politicians, and internet bloggers for what they do and say and then when I condemn some of what you do and say, I'm being offensive?  Please state specifically what I said that is over the top and tell the readers why it's different than questioning another member's masculinity.  Please don't leave me hanging with that general "go to" criticism of condescension.

Edit:  Btw, the answer is yes.  Condemning the internet bloogers attacking the pizza owners, condemning those who attack Fox women anchors, and condemning those who insult other members in our forum are all worthy criticisms.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #13 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey
kiir - The "one way" refers to hypocrisy.  The Right inside here will be critical all day long but if somebody on the Left is critical, some of those on the Right, (mostly you), will stalk and/or insult in hopes they'll drive these Lefties away.  Unfortunately, it's also been determined by some on the right, (mostly you), that if you call another member girly, moron, or idiot, and they respond by calling their opponent rude and disrespectful, it's somehow a wash as simply two people calling each other names.  Maybe that's your view but it's not the case where I come from.


If it's mostly me then you deal with me, why do you drag mike, hypocrite JG, and anyone else into it, trying to do your heavy lifting?  Again, I've made it known how much I give a rat's ass where you come from.  pretend we are entering a WWF cage instead of a debate podium.  You say "I simply challenge you when and where I can", I say bring it on.  You say conservatives can't handle 'it' [whatever 'it' is, I say I can handle 'it' and then you say 'it's' mostly me]  Show me where I didn't handle 'it'.

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #14 
"In any event, please be more specific.  Pointing out how you are willing to condemn one side and not the other is condescending?  Asking you to justify the constructive purpose of calling the first lady a "piece of work" is being offensive?  You're condemning black people, Liberals, entertainers, politicians, and internet bloggers for what they do and say and then when I condemn some of what you do and say, I'm being offensive?  Please state specifically what I said that is over the top and tell the readers why it's different than questioning another member's masculinity.  Please don't leave me hanging with that general "go to" criticism of condescension."

you are conflating mike's actions with my actions.  He doesn't have to answer for me, nor I, him.  mike will get nowhere as you have, trying to correct anything I may have said.  I stand behind anything I have ever posted.   I say use whatever ploy you have at your disposal and I'll do the same.  mike's point is those in the public eye should be held to higher standards, I agree, if you disagree you will play hell trying to conform me into your little box.  You have driven many conservatives away that is true, your panties are bunched because you and joisey didn't run me off.

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #15 
kiir - Actually, I intend to continue to mostly ignore you?  You are a disrespectful member who isn't interested in a discussion of politics, only personal attacks.  Unfortunately, every now and then I'm forced to reply to something you write.  Whether it be insults or lies presented in hopes of forcing me into replying to you, sometimes it works.  I do understand you'll go as far as possible to bait and draw me out and I'll have to try harder to avoid "biting".  Now, to be honest, I'd prefer you quit stalking me around after every post but I know that's not going to happen anytime soon.  It is what it is.   
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #16 
You don't respond directly to me but in conversations with others you quote me without my permission.  That is still stalking girly man.  

Let me put into perspective for you, 

Embedded image permalink

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #17 
p.s. I know you don't ignore me as you claim because in your posts [usually the same day, sometimes a day or two later] I will see my words verbatim used in a post to someone else.  Begging that person to chastise me.  Quit pretending you are 'ignoring' me, I ain't buying it.

p.s.s. " it's also been determined by some on the right, (mostly you), that if you call another member girly, moron, or idiot"  

you are lying again unless you can find where I called someone a moron or idiot but you are girly, I stand by that.  When I made a private response to FIB I had on an observation about your actions, you sure didn't ignore me then.  You read every word I write to chastise and criticize my posts.  quit stalking me dewy

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #18 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikec


As for the teacher - really?  Teacher, who is the queen of one-sentence posts, all of which are "you Republicans suck, are jerkwads, and should STFU." 




mikec - One more thing.  Each and every one of those authors, who Kirsten condemns for criticizing Fox women, will have numerous excuses as to why these women are fair game and deserve criticism.  Not unlike you just did here.
mikec

Registered:
Posts: 8,299
Reply with quote  #19 
If you equate "black leaders" inciting violence; gay people trying to close down people's businesses and/or incite violence; the FLOTUS going on racist rants or saying she doesn't love her country; Harry Reid openly and blatantly lying on the Senate floor, then crowing about it later; and on and on; with someone on this forum throwing out some feminine insult, then I can't help you.
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #20 
mikec - You don't need to help me.  I'm perfectly capable of illustrating how some on the Right will condemn unacceptable behavior by some and ignore equally unacceptable behavior by others depending on their partisan views.  If I had a half dozen Democrats inside here attacking members and others in a personal way, I wouldn't have the gall to point out to our readers when a Republican stepped out of line by engaging in name calling.

You do know several of you have gone to great lengths to characterize the black community in a not so pleasant manner just as some of you have gone to great lengths to negatively characterize the gay community.  If one didn't know better, you'd think the entire black community was one and the same.  With that in mind, I think it's ironic when somebody like me characterizes personal shots on the First Lady as unnecessary, or criticizes looking the other way when Conservatives behave badly, the response becomes, "why do you have to be so offensive?"  It's like I explained in post #1, "how dare you criticize us?"  Smh.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #21 
You have never come close in respecting the black community as I did in this thread, you need to quit lumping all blacks together.  Blacks that act like thugs will be called out for it, as will whites who act like thugs.  Your veiled accusations of racism will not be tolerated.  All you want from blacks is their vote, you care not about lifting people up, you want to keep the division strong.  typical libtard

http://robocoach.websitetoolbox.com/post/runaway-slave-victimization-of-blacks-6002643?highlight=runaway&pid=1286796657#post1286796657





__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 9,889
Reply with quote  #22 
This thread, like most of Dewey's posts, is a "squirrel."

Unable to muster an adequate response for the disaster of Obama and failing democrats, he resorts instead to attack the right for their methods. How rude they are, those who assail Obama's inadequacy as POTUS. How mean they are, those who chastise the poor Michelle and Hillary. How evil they are, those who oppose wasteful Big Government and higher taxes.

Yawn.

To my fellow patriots on the right, I suggest we ignore these ramblings, and keep our message on point. Continue to show the errors of the left, and avoid the deflections they resort to. They're desperation is obvious, let's not allow ourselves to get caught in their deceptive misdirection. Sidestep their rabbit holes, my friends, and resolve to stay on message. It is our time.
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #23 
FIB - This subject only results because your side finds it necessary to say "sick and vile human being", "feminine", "pompous", etc.  Your side thinks personal attacks serves a purpose.  If you had a convincing case, if you truly thought an alternative perspective was irrelevant, if you could debate without the personal insults, none of this would be necessary for discussion.  Unfortunately, too many Conservatives cannot control themselves.  Hence, we get talk of secession or talk of what potential rage lies ahead. 

I may be wrong but it appears we have members who have read us for years and have decided to register and try another approach to make the Conservative case.  To me, it's a sign your style has failed miserably.  Again, maybe I'm wrong but something made these newbies, (if they are), jump aboard.

Edit:  I'll agree with you about one thing.  Having to hear your side characterize everyone from blacks to gays to white male Democrats, and hearing those like me condemn these personal attacks against other individuals, probably gets very tiresome for our readers, assuming we have any these days.  I'd much rather make our arguments for why we believe what we believe politically rather than go round and round about these behavioral issues.
ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 9,889
Reply with quote  #24 
^^^^ Case in point. ^^^^^^
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #25 
"To my fellow patriots on the right, I suggest we ignore these ramblings, and keep our message on point. Continue to show the errors of the left, and avoid the deflections they resort to. They're desperation is obvious, let's not allow ourselves to get caught in their deceptive misdirection. Sidestep their rabbit holes, my friends, and resolve to stay on message. It is our time."


Awesome words of encouragement.  Will definitely give it a go.

"I may be wrong but it appears we have members who have read us for years and have decided to register and try another approach to make the Conservative case.  To me, it's a sign your style has failed miserably.  Again, maybe I'm wrong but something made these newbies, (if they are), jump aboard."

^^^^Not so much^^^^

Sounds like another attempt by the left to silence a member.  Why these tactics against the members?  Why the targeting?

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #26 
Why are dems so racist?




__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,780
Reply with quote  #27 
#whyaredemssohypocritical

Embedded image permalink

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
BillSmith

Registered:
Posts: 6,595
Reply with quote  #28 
kiir- Oh, now see what you've done?! There will be a move afoot to change the name of ammunition. I can see it now,

"Hey, I'm out of ammo. How many rounds have you got?"

"Dude, I'm low myself. Got maybe the 10 wizards that are in this clip."

Don't laugh. Washington has done it before!

__________________
Sometimes you are the mole, sometimes the mushroom.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,040
Reply with quote  #29 
Dewey - my ISIS commentary had nothing to do with you.  There must be something wrong with you that you think any slight comment means the conversation is about you.  Narcissus would be proud.
Dewey

Registered:
Posts: 24,423
Reply with quote  #30 
pabar - Once you go here...

"I'm sure you'd like it to be"

then you've left the subject and instead moved into reading my mind.  I'm suggesting you should please stick with the subject rather than guessing what you think is in my head.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.