Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,699
Reply with quote  #1 
Ok dewey. This dual-handled nonsense with you posing as will i win has gone on long enough. Here's the offer:

You 're-appear' as dewey today. Your story is that you have been on hiatus, and haven't had time to log on to the UCS board for months. You 'just read' some of these threads and are surprised that you have been 'mistaken' for this Will I Win loser. You assure everyone that he isn't you.

For our part, we will pretend to believe you, and pretend to welcome you back, and we will express our sorrow for having falsely impugned your integrity.

I think this is a great opportunity for you to emerge from your hole. I know you've been depressed about having lost all of those great posts from yesteryear as dewey.  Stop hiding dew, you're better than that.

__________________
"Oh yeah and the 8 agency heaDS THAT SPLIT THE uRANIUM oNE MONEY WITH THE cLINTONS. yOU ARE A NEVER ENDING SOURCE OF WISHFUL THINKING. wISHING THINGS HAPPEN THE WAY YOU NEED THEM TO TO BACK UP YOUR RIDICULOUS CONCLUSIONS."
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,039
Reply with quote  #2 
Hopefully he takes you up - itโ€™s about to get a whole lot worse for willie around here
__________________
Dewey on victims of sexual assault:  Both women later switched their stories.  Was there a reward or something else behind their change?  Who knows?
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,527
Reply with quote  #3 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce
Ok dewey. This dual-handled nonsense with you posing as will i win has gone on long enough. Here's the offer:

You 're-appear' as dewey today. Your story is that you have been on hiatus, and haven't had time to log on to the UCS board for months. You 'just read' some of these threads and are surprised that you have been 'mistaken' for this Will I Win loser. You assure everyone that he isn't you.

For our part, we will pretend to believe you, and pretend to welcome you back, and we will express our sorrow for having falsely impugned your integrity.

I think this is a great opportunity for you to emerge from your hole. I know you've been depressed about having lost all of those great posts from yesteryear as dewey.  Stop hiding dew, you're better than that.

I am pretty sure that he is not.  

__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 5,078
Reply with quote  #4 
Who appointed you spokesman for the board?๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‡
__________________
#SCOTUS
YAY!!is GAF
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,602
Reply with quote  #5 
If someone baked Dewy a cake, I know he would come out
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,602
Reply with quote  #6 
Dewy was spokesman for the forum for the 50K masses for many years. Firmly in control of the readers
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,035
Reply with quote  #7 
Quote:
Originally Posted by keepinitreal
If someone baked Dewy a cake, I know he would come out


Would he come out of the cake?
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,602
Reply with quote  #8 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61


Would he come out of the cake?
If you put 2 men on top he would

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,699
Reply with quote  #9 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
Who appointed you spokesman for the board?๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‡


hehe participation optional.

__________________
"Oh yeah and the 8 agency heaDS THAT SPLIT THE uRANIUM oNE MONEY WITH THE cLINTONS. yOU ARE A NEVER ENDING SOURCE OF WISHFUL THINKING. wISHING THINGS HAPPEN THE WAY YOU NEED THEM TO TO BACK UP YOUR RIDICULOUS CONCLUSIONS."
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,602
Reply with quote  #10 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce


hehe participation optional.


As dewy will prove

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,699
Reply with quote  #11 
pop-n-fresh is humping everybody's leg to leave his dew alone. I think dew owes it to his champion fresh to come on out of the dark web he's tangled up in. 
__________________
"Oh yeah and the 8 agency heaDS THAT SPLIT THE uRANIUM oNE MONEY WITH THE cLINTONS. yOU ARE A NEVER ENDING SOURCE OF WISHFUL THINKING. wISHING THINGS HAPPEN THE WAY YOU NEED THEM TO TO BACK UP YOUR RIDICULOUS CONCLUSIONS."
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,524
Reply with quote  #12 
I think you should pursue a path of information and enightenment, rather than posting multiple redundant posts that serve only to hide Will's message. You didn't make the posts, but your support, manifested by your silence, is equally abhorrent.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,602
Reply with quote  #13 
"I'll post anything, anytime and anywhere I want."

You made those rules old phuck

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,039
Reply with quote  #14 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
I think you should pursue a path of information and enightenment, rather than posting multiple redundant posts that serve only to hide Will's message. You didn't make the posts, but your support, manifested by your silence, is equally abhorrent.


As a person that Dewey falsely accused of using multiple handles, your defense of him is whatโ€™s abhorrent.

Deweyโ€™s posts are still there for you to read. No one is stifling anyone

__________________
Dewey on victims of sexual assault:  Both women later switched their stories.  Was there a reward or something else behind their change?  Who knows?
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,524
Reply with quote  #15 
I have no frame of reference for Dewey and frankly don't have any interest, I will respond to Will. If he ever says you were  right, I may look over Dewey's past. Until then, I'll assume this is just more intentional derailment to avoid substantive comment.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,035
Reply with quote  #16 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
I have no frame of reference for Dewey and frankly don't have any interest, I will respond to Will. If he ever says you were  right, I may look over Dewey's past. Until then, I'll assume this is just more intentional derailment to avoid substantive comment.


We've had more substantive discussion than Dewey than you'll ever be able to imagine.  Years and years of it.  You don't know what substantive discussion is - more and more you sound like that hysterical teenage girl, Bama.

You have never posted data in here, only your own opinions or the opinions of people who think like you.  Try using facts and logic, not emotion.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,524
Reply with quote  #17 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61


We've had more substantive discussion than Dewey than you'll ever be able to imagine.  Years and years of it.  You don't know what substantive discussion is - more and more you sound like that hysterical teenage girl, Bama.

You have never posted data in here, only your own opinions or the opinions of people who think like you.  Try using facts and logic, not emotion.


Initially I tried, but have discovered facts have no bearing here. You merely discount the source and continue a character assasination of Dewey, or post 30 redundant posts. Kind of pointless.
The general consensus that Weinstein is a miscreant, with no pure facts, just numerous allegations led me to my current tact. Most of our realities are not formed by pure fact, but from a collection of experiences and some statistical analysis. oowwaa's sense of proof and mine are very different. I prefer to spend my time on other endeavors than waste it on people that have already made up their minds. This is an exercise for me, I have long since given up on making a difference in your minds. Not going to happen, your realities are so different from mine. The perspectives here come from such a polar opposite, it can add depth to my own views. 
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,035
Reply with quote  #18 
Like I said, you have no idea how many substantive discussions we've had with Dewey.  So you can get off that point.  Dewey has as much responsibility for the low level of discourse as any of the rest of us.  That's why I've implored you to spend some time reading some history in here.

If you had read the history in here, you would see much discussion from those of us on the right criticizing GW Bush for his abandoning his conservative roots and allowing spending to get out of control.  We have brutalized the GOP Congress for abandoning all conservative principles.  In short, we've had no problem criticizing our own.

Turn that around to Dewey.  99.9% of the country knows he was lying when he said on approximately two dozen occasions, "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan."  That was a blatant lie, as confirmed by the lackey who talked about the idiocy of the American people.  But Dewey fell on his sword, swearing that Obama didn't mean it and would never budge an inch.  He would never, ever criticize Obama on anything.  Never.  

We finally tired of his lies and circular logic.  Then, on hundreds of occasions, as shown here recently, he would make comments about how "we don't understand", or how our opinions are simply "bashing" Obama, as if there was no substance at all.

You see, Dewey hides behind the guise of being a "civil" communicator but his nastiness is much more sinister because it's insults disguised as niceties.

Of course, nobody cares how much you want to defend Dewey.  Just know that because you have no history here, your opinion will be met with derision because you really don't know what you're talking about.

Did you know that he, as moderator, has sole ability to lock threads?  I will find proof for you that he did it because Dewey will probably not answer you if it's asked.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,035
Reply with quote  #19 
Dewey 

Registered:08/08/04
Posts: 24,423 
   #24 
Bill - For nearly eight years now, some Conservatives here have tried everything they can to deter me from sharing my perspectives as a Democrat.  They have used name calling, said nobody wants to hear my posts, told members I ban people from posting, told members I change comments of other posters, told members I alter my own posts at a later date, told members I'm lying in my comments, and so on.  The claims are lies and I've ignored almost all of it, brushed it aside, and continued to share my perspectives as I wish.  Finally, they tried a new tactic. 

Recently, they quote my post, change the words in my post, and post it as if I said something different than what I really wrote.  Now, in a sense, my perspective is being taken away from me and distorted into a different view.  Their frustration at not driving me away has reached a high point and they know the ability to share my comments are the only reason I'm here.  My only solution was to lock my comments to stop this new practice.  In no way have I stopped anyone from reacting to my comments or sharing theirs.

Needless to say, they can still copy my post and reference in their response.  To be honest, they can still copy and then use the quote function to make it look the same as before.  To be extra honest, they could still do all that and change my words to make them look like I wrote something else.  However, should they choose to continue to go that route, my actual comments are easily available to readers to compare what is accurate, and what is not.

In any event, your opinion means a lot so if you think this is a mistake on my part, I'm open to hear a different response to this new tactic those who want me gone are using.  I saw no suppression of views taking place at all.  I was simply protecting mine from being abused.  Got kid's games today so as KIR says, I'll check back later.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,035
Reply with quote  #20 
That was Dewey explaining why he locked a thread.  His explanation that he's not restricting us means that he hasn't locked all threads.  Pathetic.
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,039
Reply with quote  #21 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
I have no frame of reference for Dewey and frankly don't have any interest, I will respond to Will. If he ever says you were  right, I may look over Dewey's past. Until then, I'll assume this is just more intentional derailment to avoid substantive comment.


You insinuating that anyone else is trying to avoid substantive comments is comical.

You come here to look down your nose all of us and call us all racist. Thatโ€™s some substance right there.

__________________
Dewey on victims of sexual assault:  Both women later switched their stories.  Was there a reward or something else behind their change?  Who knows?
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,699
Reply with quote  #22 
dewey looks to be staying in the closet. Being called out by his buddy Bill Smith didn't help him.
__________________
"Oh yeah and the 8 agency heaDS THAT SPLIT THE uRANIUM oNE MONEY WITH THE cLINTONS. yOU ARE A NEVER ENDING SOURCE OF WISHFUL THINKING. wISHING THINGS HAPPEN THE WAY YOU NEED THEM TO TO BACK UP YOUR RIDICULOUS CONCLUSIONS."
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.