Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 2 of 6      Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next   »
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #31 
That pardon would get him impeached. Fast track to oblivion. Graham has already asked trump not to pardon Flynn, lest he face impeachment. trump's election to president is going to be the worst day of his life.
mikec

Registered:
Posts: 8,378
Reply with quote  #32 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
That pardon would get him impeached. Fast track to oblivion. Graham has already asked trump not to pardon Flynn, lest he face impeachment. trump's election to president is going to be the worst day of his life.


I can't imagine, even in the minds of haters, how issuing a pardon is impeachable.  It is a unique power reserved to the POTUS in the Constitution.

Anyone who would attempt impeachment against the POTUS for executing a Constitutionally defined power would risk bringing our whole gov't down.


Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #33 
Obstruction of justice is definitely what impeachment was intended for. If it's not "high crimes and misdemeanors" to pardon a treasonous government official, what would be? For whatever reason, trump is in the Russians pocket and all this is his doing. I think it might be from the days when he couldn't get financing anywhere else. Funny how all the roads of this investigation lead to Russia. 
mikec

Registered:
Posts: 8,378
Reply with quote  #34 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
Obstruction of justice is definitely what impeachment was intended for. If it's not "high crimes and misdemeanors" to pardon a treasonous government official, what would be? For whatever reason, trump is in the Russians pocket and all this is his doing. I think it might be from the days when he couldn't get financing anywhere else. Funny how all the roads of this investigation lead to Russia. 


Pardon is defined in the Constitution, and it was not given limits.  An odd quirk maybe, but that's how it is.

If someone wants trump impeached, there has to be something other than a Constitutionally granted power to do it on. 

Heck, Obama pardoned a crap load of drug dealers.  I hated it, but he's allowed to do it.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #35 
The real question is what does Flynn have on Trump.  I know everyone thinks Trump is an idiot but he was smart enough to become elected POTUS.  That actually requires listening to people and I believe he does that even if he doesn't want anyone to believe that.

Smart people have to have guided Trump away from anything illegal or impeachable.
Emptynester

Registered:
Posts: 141
Reply with quote  #36 
So Fresh, since I am new here. Were you this passionate when Obama obstructed justice with Lynch driving the bus ? 
Will_I_Wynn

Registered:
Posts: 726
Reply with quote  #37 
If Flynn is pardoned and keeps cooperating with Mueller, then probably no impeachment.  If Flynn is pardoned and stops cooperating with Mueller, possible impeachment for obstruction.  Even with the latter, impeachment seems unlikely.  Need many Republicans on board before pursuing impeachment.
__________________
A gullible nation is a vulnerable nation.  Challenge what you read on the internet.  Our nation's security is in our hands.  Don't be duped by misinformation.

The Right in here are quoting posts and changing words.  Please search for original post if accurate information is desired.




pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #38 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_I_Wynn
If Flynn is pardoned and keeps cooperating with Mueller, then probably no impeachment.  If Flynn is pardoned and stops cooperating with Mueller, possible impeachment for obstruction.  Even with the latter, impeachment seems unlikely.  Need many Republicans on board before pursuing impeachment.


As Mike said, pardons are constitutional so no legal basis for impeachment either way.  But keep hoping.
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,956
Reply with quote  #39 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce
Drumpf is done. Again.

But seriously, from what I read, Flynn was told by trump to reach out to 13 countries, including russia, and assure them that anything wack that obama was gonna do on the way out should be nothing for them to overreact to. Seems like a smart play to me. Is that 'reaching out' prohibited?


From Fox news:  

"Fox News has been told by a former senior intelligence officer with knowledge of Trump transition activities that then-President-Elect Trump directed Flynn during that period to contact the Russians -- while also directing him and his team to contact 12 other countries.

 

The transition team felt that the Obama White House had completely abandoned any coherent foreign policy and had to fill the vacuum.”


I'm serious when I ask, is that wrong?



I'm still waiting. Was this illegal, to tell flynn and whomever else to reach out to 13 countries and tell those countries to relax even if obama does something nutty before he leaves office? Yes i know flynn lied. That isn't my question. I can understand why dewfresh can't just tell me yes or no.  Was it illegal?

__________________
"Steelman, let me just ask you to knock it off with shots from two handles, or own up to it.  Please.  It's no wonder readers think there are so many Conservatives inside here."---dewey aka Will I Wynn
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #40 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce


I'm still waiting. Was this illegal, to tell flynn and whomever else to reach out to 13 countries and tell those countries to relax even if obama does something nutty before he leaves office? Yes i know flynn lied. That isn't my question. I can understand why dewfresh can't just tell me yes or no.  Was it illegal?


Yes.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #41 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emptynester
So Fresh, since I am new here. Were you this passionate when Obama obstructed justice with Lynch driving the bus ? 


Not sure what you are  referring to, but only been here about 2 months. New territory.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 24,242
Reply with quote  #42 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce


I'm still waiting. Was this illegal, to tell flynn and whomever else to reach out to 13 countries and tell those countries to relax even if obama does something nutty before he leaves office? Yes i know flynn lied. That isn't my question. I can understand why dewfresh can't just tell me yes or no.  Was it illegal?


Of course not

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #43 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61


As Mike said, pardons are constitutional so no legal basis for impeachment either way.  But keep hoping.


You are a little off base here. Any act congress deems impeachable, is impeachable. Purely at the discretion of congress and, to some extent, the vice president. Obstruction of justice would fill the bill.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #44 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh


You are a little off base here. Any act congress deems impeachable, is impeachable. Purely at the discretion of congress and, to some extent, the vice president. Obstruction of justice would fill the bill.


I'll clarify.  They can seek impeachment whenever they want.  They'll fail but they can seek.
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,414
Reply with quote  #45 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikec


Pardon is defined in the Constitution, and it was not given limits.  An odd quirk maybe, but that's how it is.

If someone wants trump impeached, there has to be something other than a Constitutionally granted power to do it on. 

Heck, Obama pardoned a crap load of drug dealers.  I hated it, but he's allowed to do it.


Fresh and the left seem uneducated on what is actually an impeachable offense. Heck, there is even some guy with way too much money running commercials to impeach because he doesn’t like the tax plan.

As usual, mike is dead on - might have disliked obama but never wanted him impeached.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
The truth is, you WANT Bill to have raped her, so you believe it.
Will_I_Wynn

Registered:
Posts: 726
Reply with quote  #46 
If Trump pardons Flynn to shut him up, and both Parties in Congress support impeachment for obstruction, Congress will include the firing of Comey and other collected evidence of interfering with the investigation to make their case, not to mention a likely charge of collusion as part of the impeachment reasons, to complete their conviction.  Does anyone truly think the SC would get involved in this process, let alone overrule it?
__________________
A gullible nation is a vulnerable nation.  Challenge what you read on the internet.  Our nation's security is in our hands.  Don't be duped by misinformation.

The Right in here are quoting posts and changing words.  Please search for original post if accurate information is desired.




ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 10,011
Reply with quote  #47 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce


I'm still waiting. Was this illegal, to tell flynn and whomever else to reach out to 13 countries and tell those countries to relax even if obama does something nutty before he leaves office? Yes i know flynn lied. That isn't my question. I can understand why dewfresh can't just tell me yes or no.  Was it illegal?


No.

If anyone on the left wants to insist otherwise they should cite the applicable code and what specific actions violated that code.

I’m sure the leftist legal eagles on Robocoach have this info at their finger tips. [rofl]
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 24,242
Reply with quote  #48 
Congress?=Pelosi, Al Green, Frederica Wilson=no worries
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 24,242
Reply with quote  #49 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverInBlue


No.

If anyone on the left wants to insist otherwise they should cite the applicable code and what specific actions violated that code.

I’m sure the leftist legal eagles on Robocoach have this info at their finger tips. [rofl]


No schitt, funny watching bamaturdkpifreshyturddewillyduaine tie themselves in pretzels. The suspense is delightful, watching them speculate their life away, knee slapper

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Will_I_Wynn

Registered:
Posts: 726
Reply with quote  #50 
It would be illegal if he was found guilty under the Logan Act.
__________________
A gullible nation is a vulnerable nation.  Challenge what you read on the internet.  Our nation's security is in our hands.  Don't be duped by misinformation.

The Right in here are quoting posts and changing words.  Please search for original post if accurate information is desired.




ForeverInBlue

Registered:
Posts: 10,011
Reply with quote  #51 
Earlier today ABC News went live with report that sent DC and liberal hysteria-mongers into a tizzy - that Flynn would testify he was directed by Trump to contact Russia during the campaign.

FAKE NEWS!

ABC has already issued a major correction:

“Clarification: During a live Special Report, ABC News reported that a confidant of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said Flynn was prepared to testify that then-candidate Donald Trump instructed him to contact Russian officials during the campaign. That source later clarified that during the campaign, Trump assigned Flynn and a small circle of other senior advisers to find ways to repair relations with Russia and other hot spots. It was shortly after the election, that President-elect Trump directed Flynn to contact Russian officials on topics that included working jointly against ISIS.”

Good luck impeaching Trump for that! [crazy]

[rofl]
[rofl]
[rofl]
Will_I_Wynn

Registered:
Posts: 726
Reply with quote  #52 
Nobody's getting impeached unless Republicans favor impeachment. At least not as long as they hold majorities.
__________________
A gullible nation is a vulnerable nation.  Challenge what you read on the internet.  Our nation's security is in our hands.  Don't be duped by misinformation.

The Right in here are quoting posts and changing words.  Please search for original post if accurate information is desired.




EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,956
Reply with quote  #53 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverInBlue
No. If anyone on the left wants to insist otherwise they should cite the applicable code and what specific actions violated that code. I’m sure the leftist legal eagles on Robocoach have this info at their finger tips. [rofl]



hmmmmm. Fresh said point-blank that my description of what happened was illegal. One of you is a wrong and therefore is a lying moron. Which of you is it? Fresh, cite that code for me.

__________________
"Steelman, let me just ask you to knock it off with shots from two handles, or own up to it.  Please.  It's no wonder readers think there are so many Conservatives inside here."---dewey aka Will I Wynn
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #54 
Don't get too comfortable with the beginning of the trump team blood letting. Flynn is just the tip of the ice berg and the big fish are to follow. Remember when the trump bunch were brought in for Q & A with Mueller? Wellllll, all that will be catalogued and they will be brought back again. This time in front of the grand jury, under oath. Once that process starts, the big rats will rat and heads will roll. 
Obstruction of justtice and consorting with Russians is definitely impeachable. Whether the republicans have the balls to do the right thing is another matter. 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,956
Reply with quote  #55 
'consorting' hahahahaha. Hey douche, where's that code citation?
__________________
"Steelman, let me just ask you to knock it off with shots from two handles, or own up to it.  Please.  It's no wonder readers think there are so many Conservatives inside here."---dewey aka Will I Wynn
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #56 
con·sort1
noun
 
ˈkänsôrt/
  1. 1.
    a wife, husband, or companion, in particular the spouse of a reigning monarch.
    synonyms:partnerlife partnercompanionmateMore
     
     
    •  
verb
 
kənˈsôrt,ˈkänˌsôrt/
  1. 1.
    habitually associate with (someone), typically with the disapproval of others.
    "you chose to consort with the enemy"
    synonyms:associate, keep company, mix, go around, spend time, socializefraternize, have dealings; More
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #57 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh


Yes.


Wrong - if he's president-elect, this is perfectly normal.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #58 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh


Not sure what you are  referring to, but only been here about 2 months. New territory.


Do you think Loretta Lynch was in any way corrupt?
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,214
Reply with quote  #59 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
Don't get too comfortable with the beginning of the trump team blood letting. Flynn is just the tip of the ice berg and the big fish are to follow. Remember when the trump bunch were brought in for Q & A with Mueller? Wellllll, all that will be catalogued and they will be brought back again. This time in front of the grand jury, under oath. Once that process starts, the big rats will rat and heads will roll. 
Obstruction of justtice and consorting with Russians is definitely impeachable. Whether the republicans have the balls to do the right thing is another matter. 


Somebody remember this post.  I can't wait to throw it back in this girl's face when she's wrong.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,996
Reply with quote  #60 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61


Do you think Loretta Lynch was in any way corrupt?


No
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.