Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 2      1   2   Next
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #1 
Ok guys.  Time to make direct demands.  Bturd brings back KPI or ... .... ..... (thats right.  lots of periods)....
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #2 
You've been treating him so nice, the doer of his daughter should do it for you
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,374
Reply with quote  #3 
KPI is sorely missed. Scissor-fighter extraordinaire. Grrrrrrrrrr.
__________________
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #4 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyGrayce
KPI is sorely missed. Scissor-fighter extraordinaire. Grrrrrrrrrr.


They're only sore when they don't lube the strap-on.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #5 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61


They're only sore when they don't lube the strap-on.


[biggrin]

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Bama_CF

Registered:
Posts: 2,277
Reply with quote  #6 
I put this in the Bring Back KPI thread because she would have jumped all over the chance to belittle and kneecap a mental midget like Tucker Carlson.  So ... 

On the state run media channel recently, Tucker Carlson posed the following question to his guest: 

"If NFL owners are racists, why are 70% of their employees black?"

I kid you not. That was his question. This was posted on twitter BY FOX NEWS (as though they thought it was good journalism or something). I'm guessing they regretted posting it after it generated hundreds of replies mocking and dismissing state run media moron Tucker. I thought I would share my choices for the Top 5, now top 6 I added one more. 


6. Oh Tucker sweetie, bless your heart. 

5. If FoxNews is not a haven for sexual predators, they why ... you know the rest. 

4. Hell yeah, owners pay thugs to play football. Fans buy tickets to watch em play football. Nothing else.

3. [From former tennis great Martina Navratilova]: "That ranks up there as one of the stupidest questions ever asked. Nice job Tucker - NOT"

2. So since 100% of plantation owners workers were black, they were totally NOT racist.  

1. Is that a trick question?

__________________

 

TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 3,570
Reply with quote  #7 
Bama, why do you keep posting information from people obviously trolling for clicks and attention. I thought you wanted substitute of debate? You sure leave a lot of questions unanswered
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #8 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bama_CF
I put this in the Bring Back KPI thread because she would have jumped all over the chance to belittle and kneecap a mental midget like Tucker Carlson.  So ... 

On the state run media channel recently, Tucker Carlson posed the following question to his guest: 

"If NFL owners are racists, why are 70% of their employees black?"

I kid you not. That was his question. This was posted on twitter BY FOX NEWS (as though they thought it was good journalism or something). I'm guessing they regretted posting it after it generated hundreds of replies mocking and dismissing state run media moron Tucker. I thought I would share my choices for the Top 5, now top 6 I added one more. 


6. Oh Tucker sweetie, bless your heart. 

5. If FoxNews is not a haven for sexual predators, they why ... you know the rest. 

4. Hell yeah, owners pay thugs to play football. Fans buy tickets to watch em play football. Nothing else.

3. [From former tennis great Martina Navratilova]: "That ranks up there as one of the stupidest questions ever asked. Nice job Tucker - NOT"

2. So since 100% of plantation owners workers were black, they were totally NOT racist.  

1. Is that a trick question?

I feel her presence in your post. 


[goLQtVu] 

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 4,903
Reply with quote  #9 
Not you, nor anyone in your twisted imagination could hold Tucker's jockstarp in a debate. But you keep on keepin on in your world.
__________________
#SCOTUS
Bama_CF

Registered:
Posts: 2,277
Reply with quote  #10 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
Not you, nor anyone in your twisted imagination could hold Tucker's jockstarp in a debate. But you keep on keepin on in your world.



Everyone who is surprised that spazsdad holds Tucker Carlson's intellect and debating skills in high regard raise your hand. How could that simpleton be good at debating. He doesn't even know what position to take until he makes sure he's informed about Trump's most recent tweets. 

Tucker was FOR getting us the heck out of Afghanistan, then he was FOR the new plan. Tucker dead set against the DACA program, then it was a good idea, now against again. Oh wait, that's Trump. Which means it's Tucker. That's how state run media works. But only the most debased, on their knees worshippers, would claim he can out-debate anyone. LOL

God give me the chance to debate Tucker Carlson with the world watching.  

__________________

 

keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #11 
You wouldn't even take the challenge of debating woody
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 4,903
Reply with quote  #12 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bama_CF



Everyone who is surprised that spazsdad holds Tucker Carlson's intellect and debating skills in high regard raise your hand.

See, I never said that I held him in high regard. You are a sad liar.
I merely commented on your pathetic skill level being insufficient to handle him.
Sad liar.

__________________
#SCOTUS
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #13 
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwApoligist

I feel her presence in your post. 


[goLQtVu] 




Nice, by the way

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #14 
Your efforts to slide my thread shall not succeed. 
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #15 
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwApoligist
Your efforts to slide my thread shall not succeed. 


*bottom of page 1.  Please bring back the strap on mean lesbian

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #16 
One of my favorite threads.  

Is KPI gone forever?  I am still holding out hope that Freshy disappears and KPI surfaces.

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #17 
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwApoligist
One of my favorite threads.  

Is KPI gone forever?  I am still holding out hope that Freshy disappears and KPI surfaces.

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #18 
brrrringing this thread back to the Top.  Sensing a disturbance in the force.  Thinking KPI maybe lurking nearby.   

Maybe having this warm welcoming thread can at the top can help things.

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,151
Reply with quote  #19 
A fool yes, you are.
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 4,903
Reply with quote  #20 
Libs must hate seeing people have fun
__________________
#SCOTUS
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 3,570
Reply with quote  #21 
Auburn_CF is back, so maybe KPI will make a return as well
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #22 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNarrator
Auburn_CF is back, so maybe KPI will make a return as well


He's back, doing dewwilly's durty work

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,374
Reply with quote  #23 
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
__________________
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #24 
Nearrrrrr sighting got me excited, bumping this thread to celebrate.
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #25 
KIRrrrrrrrr upgraded it to an official sighting.
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #26 
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwApoligist
KIRrrrrrrrr upgraded it to an official sighting.


Anytime someone quotes Brooking, it's got all the signs

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #27 
Quote:
Originally Posted by keepinitreal


Anytime someone quotes Brooking, it's got all the signs

Well we are definitely taking it.  It is Friday, so a full day off from Bama_cf.  It is like an early start to weekend.  

Strangely we will not be seeing dewillie today either.  We used to see super excited dewillie on Fridays.  Around 5pm PST, it seemed like we got a lot of great liquored up dewillie action.  That was always fun.  

But we have had to learn to adjust to just starting the relaxing weekend early and enjoying occasionally randomly excited bama_cf and this new somewhat unengaged version of dewillie.  

Still as someone said recently.  The board is the gift that keeps giving.

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 3,570
Reply with quote  #28 
I'll just leave this here for you guys - set off what was the first of Dewey's many sabbaticals:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewey
OK, I'm back from a special evening celebrating the 48th anniversary of some dear friends and I must say, I'm deeply disappointed there has been absolutely zero debate regarding the mocking of women.  Not one person chose to take the pro-mocking or anti-mocking side of this debate with any kind of intellectual case one way or the other.  The only conclusion I can come to is when one is on both sides of an issue, it must be hard to debate.  Total bummer as I was really looking forward to reading the pro and con comments regarding mocking women in the public arena.  Oh well, screw it.  Let's just move on to another subject as this one is apparently going nowhere.  Next is border security.

My understanding is almost all Conservatives want to "shoot to kill" all immigrants trying to cross our border.  Just take them out, one by one.  Women and children, it doesn't matter, just shoot to kill and leave them in the river or desert or wherever they may drop.  Now I suppose it's not out of the realm of possibility that I'm overstating the case a bit here and, if so, there might be some who will step forward and counter what I've just stated.  I'm not sure what their argument to the contrary will be but I can tell you this, not one Conservative inside here or anywhere in public has ever stated "we shouldn't shoot and kill all those people trying to cross our border illegally".  I did a Google search and couldn't find one example.  If anybody has heard even one Conservative make such a statement, I'm willing to take another look and reconsider.  Until then, let's debate the wisdom of this approach.  

I'll go on record as saying it may be the worst idea I've ever heard in my lifetime and would go down as one of the most horrific things this Country has ever participated in.  That's it.  That's my position on border security and the idea of "shooting to kill" those coming across our borders.  Now I'll step aside again and look forward to the pro and con debates regarding this kind of border security.  Please don't disappoint me again tomorrow with a complete absence of debate.  Thanks.
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 3,570
Reply with quote  #29 
Willie is definitely Dewey - check out his new tag line:

Caution:  The Right in this forum often quotes posts, while changing the content, in order to mislead readers as to what the original poster actually wrote. 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #30 
Do the Dew
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.