Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 2      1   2   Next
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #1 
Open my door this morning let my doggo go out for potty.  Normal stuff, normal morning. 
I hear a concerning yelp from him.  Go out on my deck, and I see that f'er bama_cf just going to town on my poor doggo.  Doggo has strange confused horrified look on his face.  Bama_cf pulls out and jumps my fence and runs off.  

Please please what ever you do, not let Bama_cf near your doggo's. 

[4ba9dd0ff67bcffb153a0409fb92bc8d] 

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 4,903
Reply with quote  #2 
Freaking classic.
First his daughter then a dog. His sick mind knows no bounds

__________________
#SCOTUS
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #3 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
Freaking classic. First his daughter then a dog. His sick mind knows no bounds

I heard the only differences between them is gender and he's only related to one by blood (didn't say which one)...
rudymartinez

Registered:
Posts: 392
Reply with quote  #4 
You boys have gone a little to far. Have you run out of intelligent discourse? Shame on you Udub.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,151
Reply with quote  #5 
They can be very sophomoric at times. Not funny. 
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #6 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
You boys have gone a little to far. Have you run out of intelligent discourse? Shame on you Udub.

Hey Rewdey, this is satire inspired by Bama's malicious false accusations against KIR and TDN.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #7 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
They can be very sophomoric at times. Not funny. 


It's always funny even if one or two people think it's not funny and then it's still funny.

Tamale boy were you here when the dumbass said I didn't serve in the Marine Corps, when I did, he also said I was a registered sex offender. Several here didn't think that was funny eirher. Piss off with your opinion old man, no one gives a phuck about your IMO

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #8 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDad

Hey Rewdey, this is satire inspired by Bama's malicious false accusations against KIR and TDN.


Exactly, satire at its finest so piss off if you don't like the thread, don't read it then. It could get hilarious

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
spazsdad

Registered:
Posts: 4,903
Reply with quote  #9 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
You boys have gone a little to far. Have you run out of intelligent discourse? Shame on you Udub.

You show your total ignorance of what has transpired here.
Fresh is just clueless

__________________
#SCOTUS
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #10 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
You show your total ignorance of what has transpired here. Fresh is just clueless


Fvck off Rudy.  You're clueless as to what has happened here.  Bama has clearly shown he is criminally insane.  Don't post here again until you get up to speed.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #11 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
You show your total ignorance of what has transpired here. Fresh is just clueless


Fvck off Rudy.  You're clueless as to what has happened here.  Bama has clearly shown he is criminally insane.  Don't post here again until you get up to speed.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #12 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spazsdad
You show your total ignorance of what has transpired here. Fresh is just clueless


Fvck off Rudy.  You're clueless as to what has happened here.  Bama has clearly shown he is criminally insane.  Don't post here again until you get up to speed.
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #13 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
You boys have gone a little to far. Have you run out of intelligent discourse? Shame on you Udub.

Shame on me, think of my poor doggo.  He is a rescue animal.  Came from a poor underprivileged neighborhood.  He does not deserve that treatment.

Look at his face. 

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #14 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
You boys have gone a little to far. Have you run out of intelligent discourse? Shame on you Udub.

Shame on me, think of my poor doggo.  He is a rescue animal.  Came from a poor underprivileged neighborhood.  He does not deserve that treatment.

Look at his face.

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #15 
Sorry for the multiple replies.  Did not mean anything by it.  Server was acting funky and just giving me a blank page.
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
rudymartinez

Registered:
Posts: 392
Reply with quote  #16 
Obviously in the world of mindless morons, two wrongs do make a right. Spazdud you would have to graduate night school to qualify for ignorance. And keepinitredneck, you're proud to be a Marine, they're probably not you were one. Is this how you play the game boys?
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #17 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
Obviously in the world of mindless morons, two wrongs do make a right. Spazdud you would have to graduate night school to qualify for ignorance. And keepinitredneck, you're proud to be a Marine, they're probably not you were one. Is this how you play the game boys?

I must have missed your commenting on bamaturds threads. 

__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #18 
We generally play it as it comes. You should do the same thing and don't start with fvcking forum etiquette until you prove you have any yourself. Right now you're just another troll, we've had several. Play the game or sit on the bench, be a troll or not
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
EarlyGrayce

Registered:
Posts: 4,374
Reply with quote  #19 
Quote:
Originally Posted by uwApoligist

Shame on me, think of my poor doggo.  He is a rescue animal.  Came from a poor underprivileged neighborhood.  He does not deserve that treatment.

Look at his face.


A Very expressive face. A curious pup, but not bestiality-curious. Frolicking in the backyard, chasing some squirrels, then uh oh. Stranger Danger coming over the fence. It's all very sad and off-putting.

__________________
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #20 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudymartinez
Obviously in the world of mindless morons, two wrongs do make a right. Spazdud you would have to graduate night school to qualify for ignorance. And keepinitredneck, you're proud to be a Marine, they're probably not you were one. Is this how you play the game boys?


Do yourself a favor and have an intelligent post before you start shooting off your mouth.  So far, the only weak game you've shown is being Bama's and Fresh's b1tch.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,151
Reply with quote  #21 
Damn, was James Thurber reincarnated through these explosively funny quips from the dark web? Sitting here with my sides hurting over the depth of conservative, mean spirited humor.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,000
Reply with quote  #22 
I told you this one would be one of the funny ones and here you are like I predicted. Attracted like a moth to the flame. You've already said how sophomoric and not funny they are, yet here's where your dumbass logs on. Who's the fool old man? You, that's who
__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
rudymartinez

Registered:
Posts: 392
Reply with quote  #23 
Troll? I prefer turd in the punch bowl. Regardless, I failed to read in the bylaws where this forum is the sole property of grumpy old men standing around the campfire wearing pussy hats and wondering whatever happened to the Jim Crow law. If not for we party crashers, this forum would  have imploded years ago. So get on your knees and thank God you 7 or 8 toothless wonders have perceived enemies to hate. Without us, you're just a stroke waiting to happen. That or rampant homosexuality.
woody

Registered:
Posts: 8,820
Reply with quote  #24 
Wow Rudy, you are all anyone could want in a Troll, and more. That said, I do believe that Bama crossed a legal line, and I stated as much in past threads. I'm not interested in joining in on this cluster F debate. I just urge you to look back on some threads, and see who crossed over the line. It was to the point of not only slander, but criminal liability. I'm not interested in this Sh1t Show. It leads to no positive debate, or outcome for anyone involved in my opinion. Just look at what was said, the outright slander committed by Bama, and the potential criminality involved in his posts. After you have read what was posted by Bama, please return, and attempt to offer a rational defense of his actions. I may vehemently disagree with someone, and have some harsh words in debate, but I wouldn't accuse someone of being a sex offender, or say they participated in stolen valor. That is unfortunately what Bama in a verbal tirade accused KIR of. I know KIR, and that is complete BS. So, if you want to troll someone, go read the threads, and then go troll Bama for being evil, and openly slandering someone on this forum. In the least I believe if you are a decent person, you would have to admit Bama has acted as either incoherent, or that he was intentionally behaving as a despicable individual. Feel free to call me a backwards, uneducated, Redneck, old right winger, absent of modern PC sentiment. I will openly debate anything you care to throw my way, but don't come trolling this forum ignorant of past indiscretions by Bama, and carry his water without knowing the depth of what he has done. At best it shows you don't put in the time on researching before entering into debate. At the worst it shows you are blinded by political ideology, and would follow someone of bad character over a cliff in pursuit of trolling those you disagree with.
__________________
Anarcho Capitalism. Get some, and no you can't have any of my money to live off of you Socialist Democrat.

"IT'S GOOD TO BE DA KING"
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 9,543
Reply with quote  #25 
Woody, as usual, for the win.
rudymartinez

Registered:
Posts: 392
Reply with quote  #26 
Never supported nor defended Bama. Until now never mentioned his name. Revisit my posts. I said a line was crossed. But in your one dimensional minds, I must be supporting Bama. There's lot of back slapping and ass kissing going on here, (see Poobags last post) and even more of if your not for me than you must be against me. I choose my own path. Don't need the approval of the good old boys to validate my viewpoints. You are right Woodrow, some facts do need to be checked. Mostly by you and your cohorts.
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 6,887
Reply with quote  #27 
Check who crossed what line first.  Then get back to us.  Very easy stuff rudy.
__________________
DC v Hellar - Landmark Supreme Court case established that "protects an individual right to keep and bear arms", that right was "premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad)." 
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,151
Reply with quote  #28 
Not sure why you guys get so caught up in extraneous stuff that adds nothing to the discussion. Quoting dark web sources is one thing, but calling people stupid(with no supporting facts), ignorant, adding tard or turd to their name, making up false scenarios about their family, all these childish musings only serve to make you look foolish. There are 2 of you I completely ignore now due to your disregard for the truth and your constant distortion of the facts. Saying a person's intent doesn't matter, is the most foolish thing I've ever heard. For a person to perform an act for a specific purpose and have you put your own interpretation to it and condemn him for that false premise is purely dishonest. Attack his premise that black people are oppressed, not some fabricated belief he hates the American flag and the military. That is just wrong. You took the easy road.
rudymartinez

Registered:
Posts: 392
Reply with quote  #29 
But mommy , he hit me first.  I say we more on to something more important, if indeed there is anything else.



bluedog

Registered:
Posts: 9,725
Reply with quote  #30 
I agree with Rudy - a line has been crossed.............If all it takes for the crude filth and grossness to come out is for one poster to start the process, well, that's really sad.......... 

Everyone chooses their path...........And, like Rudy, I choose my own.............
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.