Ultimate College Softball
Register Calendar Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 5 of 15     «   Prev   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   Next   »
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,040
Reply with quote  #121 
Sad that you can't come up with any new material.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #122 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61
Sad that you can't come up with any new material.


The thread was named for him and his SIL, 2 months ago the two retards didn't even know who they were so they have a lot of catching up to do.  The fact that they constantly legitimize, apologize and excuse antiFa's behavior says all you need to know about their sorry asses.


#shortbus

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,109
Reply with quote  #123 
At least all the republicans on this board have, without a doubt, denounced everything that is to do with White Supremacist and the Nazi's (even thought they are socialist).

To say that Antifa "is at least on the right side" is excusing their tactics which to most are deplorable.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
The truth is, you WANT Bill to have raped her, so you believe it.
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #124 
Like most Libs, Fresh is using the "ends justifies the means" defense for inexcusable conduct.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,636
Reply with quote  #125 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDad
Like most Libs, Fresh is using the "ends justifies the means" defense for inexcusable conduct.


At no time have I ever advocated the ends justify the means. I mean just what was so eloquently put in that quote from the New Yorker. Doesn't excuse their behaviour, but they are on the right side. Don't read intent into my words. I generally say exactly what I mean. The link goes to an exally well written piece on antifa. 
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,636
Reply with quote  #126 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61
Sad that you can't come up with any new material.


Sad you can't ever come up with proof of your claims. Echos from the circle of jerk won't work on me. Not a conspiracy guy.
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,040
Reply with quote  #127 
Not to pat myself on the back, but I'm not sure who has ever provided more substantiation for his claims over the past 5 years than I have.
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,109
Reply with quote  #128 
I wouldn't argue with that claim - pabar knows his stuff.  Dude keeps up
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
The truth is, you WANT Bill to have raped her, so you believe it.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #129 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pabar61
Not to pat myself on the back, but I'm not sure who has ever provided more substantiation for his claims over the past 5 years than I have.


I'd 2nd that after Durden's motion

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #130 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
At no time have I ever advocated the ends justify the means. I mean just what was so eloquently put in that quote from the New Yorker. Doesn't excuse their behaviour, but they are on the right side. Don't read intent into my words. I generally say exactly what I mean. The link goes to an exally well written piece on antifa. 

It's clear as day - you tacitly downplay their inexcusable behavior (means) by promoting your perception of their intentions (ends). 

Please explain your support for anarchists that advocate violence and becoming ungovernable.

[Occupy-Oakland-Twitter-340x189] 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #131 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDad

It's clear as day - you tacitly downplay their inexcusable behavior (means) by promoting your perception of their intentions (ends). 

Please explain your support for anarchists that advocate violence and becoming ungovernable.

[Occupy-Oakland-Twitter-340x189] 



We've posted that before but worth repeating I guess.  Yes and when he "you tacitly downplay their inexcusable behavior" then I know and you know that he's trolling this forum

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #132 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
... As Josh Marshall points out, at Talking Points Memo, these situations tend to work to the benefit of reactionaries, not progressives:

Check out the link for a history of antifa and commentary
They are bad, but at least on the right side. They actually help Trump with their tactics by giving the nazis propaganda ammo.

That article is a mess - it uses nomenclature to try and make a distinction where there is really little-to-no difference. Seriously, what is the difference between "law and order" and "stronger rule of law and an empowered state behind it"? LMAO It's pure delusional rationalization.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,636
Reply with quote  #133 
It's clear as day - you tacitly downplay their inexcusable behavior (means) by promoting your perception of their intentions (ends). 

I stated their intentions......defeating fascists are the good guys. I have stated, about 1000 times I don't support violence in any form except as self defense. How many more ways do I have to say it. I will not equate fighting fascists with hanging black people, burning them out of their homes and stating jews are subhuman. You may, if you wish.
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #134 
Trump's general denunciation of hate, violence, racism and bigotry was deemed insufficient cuz he didn't call them out by name. Same applies to you Fresh - you need to denounce antifa's violence specifically or it will be clear you condone their actions. 

You also didn't address antifa's larger goals of anarchism.

BTW, I'm denounced antifa, KKK, Nazis and WS. So, FU for your spurious suggestion.
Fresh

Registered:
Posts: 2,636
Reply with quote  #135 
I thought I just did. I do not support antifa violence. I don't support antifa hitting someone, spitting on someone, hitting someone with a stick, kicking someone, pushing someone, slapping someone, kicking someone's car, slugging dogs and cats. I don't support antifa macing someone, other than self defense. I don't support antifa pushing someone down, picking someone up, tying ropes to someone and dragging them through the streets, riding a horse through a street full of people, driving a tank through a group of people, flying an airplane through a group of people. I don't support antifa spilling paint on someone, spilling acid on someone, stepping on someone's foot, pushing to the front of the line at Hardees, Burger King, McDonalds. I don't support aw fukk, you might get it by now.

If you don't like how the article was written, sorry.
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,545
Reply with quote  #136 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
I thought I just did. I do not support antifa violence. I don't support antifa hitting someone, spitting on someone, hitting someone with a stick, kicking someone, pushing someone, slapping someone, kicking someone's car, slugging dogs and cats. I don't support antifa macing someone, other than self defense. I don't support antifa pushing someone down, picking someone up, tying ropes to someone and dragging them through the streets, riding a horse through a street full of people, driving a tank through a group of people, flying an airplane through a group of people. I don't support antifa spilling paint on someone, spilling acid on someone, stepping on someone's foot, pushing to the front of the line at Hardees, Burger King, McDonalds. I don't support aw fukk, you might get it by now.

If you don't like how the article was written, sorry.

good post.  

__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,545
Reply with quote  #137 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
It's clear as day - you tacitly downplay their inexcusable behavior (means) by promoting your perception of their intentions (ends). 

I stated their intentions......defeating fascists are the good guys. I have stated, about 1000 times I don't support violence in any form except as self defense. How many more ways do I have to say it. I will not equate fighting fascists with hanging black people, burning them out of their homes and stating jews are subhuman. You may, if you wish.

Forming a fascist group of black block violent thugs to thwart fascism is exactly the mistake.  These guys could not be making any bigger mistake in history.  Becoming a fascist to fight fascism, that is how it all goes wrong.

That is the very definition of what Hitlers Brown Shirts were doing.  There is exactly zero difference from Antifa, Hitlers Brown Shirts, KKK, Modern day Nazi's and WS.  

You may want to go back to your left friends and spend a bit of time with them on this.  Even though it took us way to long to get you to the errors of this way, you eventually got to it.  A lot on the left are severely confused right now.  That is not good for the country.

__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
pabar61

Registered:
Posts: 11,040
Reply with quote  #138 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
I thought I just did. I do not support antifa violence. I don't support antifa hitting someone, spitting on someone, hitting someone with a stick, kicking someone, pushing someone, slapping someone, kicking someone's car, slugging dogs and cats. I don't support antifa macing someone, other than self defense. I don't support antifa pushing someone down, picking someone up, tying ropes to someone and dragging them through the streets, riding a horse through a street full of people, driving a tank through a group of people, flying an airplane through a group of people. I don't support antifa spilling paint on someone, spilling acid on someone, stepping on someone's foot, pushing to the front of the line at Hardees, Burger King, McDonalds. I don't support aw fukk, you might get it by now.

If you don't like how the article was written, sorry.


We agree on everything you said. The final thing for you to realize is that Antifa has no noble purpose or agenda.  Their fake agenda is opposing white supremacy but their actions consistently belie that fake agenda.  Their real agenda is anarchy and you can find plenty of social media posts to support that conclusion.
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #139 
"I don't support" is not the same as denouncing - sounds like you're still dodging the issue.

Fresh also dodged my question about the article he promoted - Seriously, what is the difference between "law and order" and "stronger rule of law and an empowered state behind it"? - because he can't answer it. 

Authoritarianism is in the eye of the beholder.
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,545
Reply with quote  #140 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDad
"I don't support" is not the same as denouncing - sounds like you're still dodging the issue.

Fresh also dodged my question about the article he promoted - Seriously, what is the difference between "law and order" and "stronger rule of law and an empowered state behind it"? - because he can't answer it. 

Authoritarianism is in the eye of the beholder.

good points.  Will be interesting to see the answers.

__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
Will_I_Wynn

Registered:
Posts: 437
Reply with quote  #141 
Again, did any right leaning member denounce our member using the word faggot?  One did long after the fact.  Does that mean teh others here condone it's use?  Probably not.  This criticizm aimed at one side in this instance is quite unfair. 
__________________
A gullible nation is a vulnerable nation.  Challenge what you read on the internet.  Our nation's security is in our hands.  Don't be duped by misinformation.




uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,545
Reply with quote  #142 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_I_Wynn
Again, did any right leaning member denounce our member using the word faggot?  One did long after the fact.  Does that mean teh others here condone it's use?  Probably not.  This criticizm aimed at one side in this instance is quite unfair. 

Hey dewy!  How is it going?

__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #143 
Same old Dewey... Only thing new is hiding under a different name.

If you're really interested in fairness, you would've called out left-leaning members for their egregious name calling. #hypocrisy
PDad

Registered:
Posts: 4,062
Reply with quote  #144 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDad
"I don't support" is not the same as denouncing - sounds like you're still dodging the issue.

Fresh also dodged my question about the article he promoted - Seriously, what is the difference between "law and order" and "stronger rule of law and an empowered state behind it"? - because he can't answer it. 

Authoritarianism is in the eye of the beholder.
TheNarrator

Registered:
Posts: 4,109
Reply with quote  #145 
I have never been more convinced of anything in my life.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fresh
The truth is, you WANT Bill to have raped her, so you believe it.
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #146 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_I_Wynn
Again, did any right leaning member denounce our member using the word faggot?  One did long after the fact.  Does that mean teh others here condone it's use?  Probably not.  This criticizm aimed at one side in this instance is quite unfair. 


I respectfully ask that you stop using the word faggot, got it pussy?

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #147 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNarrator
I have never been more convinced of anything in my life.


dewy has purchased the handle from one of the 2004 pioneers

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #148 
Berkeley antiFa member mugshot, make him famous.  For the 50,000 readers

[DIaXxtQVwAAU61w]

__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
uwApoligist

Registered:
Posts: 7,545
Reply with quote  #149 
Quote:
Originally Posted by keepinitreal


dewy has purchased the handle from one of the 2004 pioneers

What did Will_I_Wynn behave like before Dewey took his skin off and put it on?  Image below applies:

[image] 



__________________
Who gives a F if the japs are listening to her blathering about women's issues?  
keepinitreal

Registered:
Posts: 23,769
Reply with quote  #150 
Row 1 (L-R) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2 (L-R) James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3 (L-R) Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines, Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Phots/Alameda County Sheriff)

Row 1: (left to right) Brittany Mooreman, Emily Gillespie, Harlan Paknau. Row 2: James Dominic, Joshua Phillips, Kristopher Wyrick, Levi Smith. Row 3: Rachael Lea Moore, Sean Hines,
Seth Vasquez, Yesenia Mendez. (Photos/Alameda County Sheriff)

Berkeley Police released mugshots Tuesday of 11 of the 13 persons arrested at Sunday’s violent political riots in the California university town.

Charges include assault with a deadly weapon, felony assault and various municipal code violations.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/unmasked-11-antifa-mugshots-guaranteed-to-make-your-blood-boil/#ejdD1SxyAuGx4ztv.99



__________________
"I like to establish the parameters of my own thoughts and don't think I need a director."

"This is not debate class. And this is not about politeness. We're talking about the damn future of our country"

"It is not just simply yelling out a name and yelling down dissenters........................... and I'll defend your right to even insult me" 
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.